Divorces often take a long time to be finalised, especially when contested. This usually translates into a huge financial burden on the shoulders of the spouse with the lesser means. Rule 43 of the Uniform Rules (High Court) provides for interim relief pertaining to the challenge mentioned above, and others as provided in the rule.
In this article, we take a look at the principles applicable to this legislative mechanism.
The proverbial ‘Stalingrad tactics’ strategy often works against the spouse/party that has less resources (including financial) at their disposal. For those unfamiliar with this strategy, it refers to a situation where those arraigned in criminal proceedings or sued under civil procedures, employ all forms of ways to delay the finalization of the matter in order to, amongst other things, frustrate the plaintiff or complainant in the hope that they will withdraw the matter. Usually, this is done when one has little prospects of success in the matter.
Before a divorce is finalised, there is an exchange of several pleadings between the parties. Where parties reach a settlement in a divorce matter or the divorce is uncontested, the costs are usually less than in a contested divorce, and more often finalised quicker a lot quicker.
However, while the above processes are still pending and in motion, a party to the action may require interim relief where it might not be ideal to wait until the finalization of the matter. To put this into context, the Court may grant relief on maintenance, custody of minor children, access rights as well as to give a costs order.
An order for maintenance e.g spousal maintenance, usually takes effect upon the official dissolution of the marriage i.e. when the decree of divorce is granted. However, as spouses have reciprocal duties of support, the other spouse may require maintenance whilst the divorce is still in its process to be finalised.
Rule 43 of the Uniform Rules (High Court) provides for interim relief in the instance as mentioned above. An order under Rule 43 may be sought to seek relief in the following instances:
Maintenance pendente lite refers to interim maintenance whilst the divorce is still pending before the relevant Court. Such maintenance can either be for the minor children or either of the spouses. The party requesting such maintenance ought to deliver a notice with a sworn statement motivating the grounds upon which the relief is sought, and to show cause why the party requesting the relief will be prejudiced in the event that the relief is not granted.
As a matter of reference, Rule 58 of the Rules Governing Proceedings in the Magistrate’s Court provides for the same relief in the Regional Courts (as they also have jurisdiction to hear divorces).
Van Deventer and Van Deventer Incorporated assists with family law matters such as maintenance, divorces, protection orders, Rule 43 applications, Rule 58 applications and others. We also assist in general litigation, civil matters, criminal, labour, personal injury, company law, deceased estates amidst an array of others.
Contact us for comprehensive assistance.
The information contained in this site is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. One should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in this site without seeking legal or other professional advice. The contents of this site contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments or address one’s peculiar situation. We disclaim all liability for actions one may take or fail to take based on any content on this site.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Estate Agent Training
Bond & Transfer Calculator
Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.