A Deeper Look into National Health Insurance in South Africa | Legal Articles


Need Legal Advice?

No Matter What Your Bind We Can Help You



Legal Articles

A Deeper Look into National Health Insurance in South Africa

The National Health Insurance Bill was presented to Parliament in August 2019 and has since garnered significant attention from various stakeholders. The Portfolio Committee on Health (PCH) has been actively seeking input from interested parties through submissions and public hearings conducted across the country. The overwhelming response to the Bill has been unprecedented, with over 100,000 submissions received by the PCH and requests for oral presentations from more than 130 individuals, organizations, and institutions. The issue has been widely debated and discussed in the media and on social media platforms.

What is the Purpose of the National Health Insurance?

The Bill aims to establish the National Health Insurance Fund as a means to achieve universal health coverage (UHC) in South Africa through various health policy interventions. However, there are divergent views among the respondents to the Bill regarding the likelihood of its success in achieving UHC. On one end of the spectrum, there are those who unconditionally support the Bill as a framework for delivering UHC in South Africa, as expressed through media endorsements, written submissions, or at hearings. On the other end of the spectrum, there are those who oppose the Bill in its entirety, although there have been no indications of opposition to the principle of UHC. In between, there are those who conditionally support or oppose the Bill, with concerns centered around issues such as state corruption, capacity to implement healthcare reforms, and governance challenges. These concerns have been further heightened by the shortcomings exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic, including corruption, lack of leadership, healthcare system failures, and vaccine rollout challenges. Other concerns raised include governance, the role of the Minister, benefit design, pricing and reimbursement mechanisms, the role of medical schemes, exclusions for certain non-citizens, and the constitutionality of certain provisions.

As the PCH reviews the Bill, it is guided by the Constitution and parliamentary rules on legislation passing (National Assembly and/or Joint Rules of both Houses). The PCH has several options for dealing with the Bill, as outlined in Assembly Rules 267-268. One option is to pass the Bill without any changes or with only minor amendments, effectively disregarding the concerns raised. However, this may result in Constitutional Court challenges and further erosion of public support for the National Health Insurance (NHI) concept, which is crucial for successful implementation. Moreover, if the negative outcomes predicted by the Bill's critics materialize, it could weaken rather than strengthen the healthcare system in the long run.

Another option for the PCH is to make substantive amendments to the Bill to address the concerns raised, while adhering to the subject of the Bill as outlined in the memorandum of objects and obtaining express permission from the Assembly for any deviations. Additionally, given the polarized views among stakeholders, further consultation may be necessary. From a public policy perspective, the potential impact of any amendments on the NHI's ability to deliver UHC is a critical consideration.

The third option is for the PCH to reject the Bill if it determines that the substantive objections raised are legitimate and require further consideration. According to the rules of the National Assembly, if a bill lapses or is rejected during a session, no "new" Bill of the same substance can be introduced in the Assembly in the same year.

When Will NHI be Implemented in South Africa?

If the Bill is substantially revised or rewritten, it would need to undergo further public participation and comment. This "back-to-the-drawing-board" approach could nullify the lengthy process of engagement, drafting, and redrafting that has been initiated since the release of the Green Paper on NHI in 2011 and may result in substantial discord among supporters of the Bill. The timeline for developing and reaching a consensus on an alternative plan is uncertain.

The timeline for developing and reaching a consensus on an alternative plan is uncertain, and the delay in implementing UHC may have consequences for the millions of South Africans who continue to face financial barriers to accessing quality healthcare services.

Corruption vs Execution of Universal Health Coverage in South Africa

One of the key concerns raised by critics of the Bill is the issue of state corruption and governance challenges. South Africa has had a history of corruption scandals, and there are concerns that the establishment of a National Health Insurance Fund may be vulnerable to similar risks. Critics argue that without robust mechanisms in place to prevent corruption and ensure transparent and accountable governance, the implementation of the NHI may be undermined, leading to inefficiencies, mismanagement of funds, and ultimately, a failure to achieve UHC.

Another contentious issue is the role of the Minister of Health in the proposed NHI system. The Bill grants the Minister significant powers, including the authority to determine the benefits package, pricing and reimbursement mechanisms, and the ability to establish and dissolve advisory committees. Some stakeholders have raised concerns about the concentration of power in the hands of the Minister, arguing that it may lead to potential abuses and lack of checks and balances.

The role of medical schemes, which are currently providing health coverage to a significant portion of the population in South Africa, is another area of concern. The Bill proposes that medical schemes will be required to convert into complementary plans under the NHI system, and some stakeholders are apprehensive about the implications of this transition, including potential disruptions in coverage and loss of benefits for members of medical schemes.

Discrimination and Constitutionality

Additionally, there are concerns about the exclusion of certain non-citizens from the NHI system. The Bill proposes that only citizens and permanent residents will be eligible for NHI coverage, while other non-citizen groups, such as asylum seekers and undocumented migrants, will be excluded. Some stakeholders argue that this approach may violate the principles of equity and non-discrimination and may result in vulnerable populations being denied access to essential healthcare services.

Furthermore, there are concerns about the constitutionality of certain provisions in the Bill, and the potential for legal challenges if the Bill is passed in its current form. Some stakeholders have raised concerns about the compatibility of the Bill with the South African Constitution, particularly in relation to issues of property rights, access to healthcare, and the right to privacy.

In conclusion, while the National Health Insurance Bill has generated significant attention and debate in South Africa, there are divergent views among stakeholders regarding its potential to achieve universal health coverage. Critics raise concerns about issues such as state corruption, governance challenges, the concentration of power in the hands of the Minister, the role of medical schemes, exclusion of non-citizens, and the constitutionality of certain provisions. The Portfolio Committee on Health faces the challenge of carefully considering these concerns and deciding on the most appropriate course of action, which may include passing the Bill with amendments, rejecting the Bill, or further consultation and redrafting. The outcome of this process will have far-reaching implications for the future of healthcare in South Africa and the ability to achieve UHC for all citizens.

Van Deventer & Van Deventer Incorporated – Attorneys in Johannesburg and Cape Town

Van Deventer & Van Deventer Incorporated is well-equipped to assist clients with legal matters related to the National Health Insurance Bill or any other complex legal issue. Our experienced team of attorneys is knowledgeable in the field of healthcare law and can provide expert guidance and representation to clients who may be affected by the proposed changes.

Whether you are a healthcare provider, a medical scheme member, a citizen concerned about your rights, or have other legal concerns related to the NHI Bill, our attorneys in Cape Town and Johannesburg can provide you with professional legal assistance.

Contact us today to schedule a consultation and find out how we can help you navigate the legal landscape in South Africa.

Comments are closed for this post, but if you have spotted an error or have additional info that you think should be in this post, feel free to contact us.


Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.